On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 07:17:56PM +0800, Bernard wrote: > > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> > Date: 2020-11-04 19:02:53 > To: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]> > Cc: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>,Shawn Guo <[email protected]>,Sascha > Hauer <[email protected]>,Pengutronix Kernel Team > <[email protected]>,Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>,NXP Linux Team > <[email protected]>,[email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected] > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] drivers/tty: delete break after return or goto>On > Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 02:53:29AM -0800, Bernard Zhao wrote: > >> This patch sereies optimise code like: > >> { > >> case XXX: > >> return XXX; > >> break; //The break is meanless, so just delete it. > >> case YYY: > >> goto YYY; > >> break; //The break is meanless, so just delete it. > >> ...... > >> } > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]> > >> > >> --- > >> Bernard Zhao (2): > >> drivers/tty/nozomi.c: delete no use break after goto > >> drivers/tty/serial/imx.c: delete no use break after return > > > >That is not the subject of the patches you sent out, what broke? > > Hi: > > I am sorry that I am a little confused: > The patch series`s subject is "drivers/tty: delete break after return or goto" > and the blurb is: > This patch sereies optimise code like: > { > case XXX: > return XXX; > break; //The break is meanless, so just delete it. > case YYY: > goto YYY; > break; //The break is meanless, so just delete it. > ...... > } > last, the modified files are: > Bernard Zhao (2): > drivers/tty/nozomi.c: delete no use break after goto > drivers/tty/serial/imx.c: delete no use break after return > > Is there something wrong that I didn`t catch?
The above lines do not match up with the subject lines of the patches you sent out, so something went wrong. thanks, greg k-h
