On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 07:17:56PM +0800, Bernard wrote: > > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > Date: 2020-11-04 19:02:53 > To: Bernard Zhao <bern...@vivo.com> > Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirisl...@kernel.org>,Shawn Guo <shawn...@kernel.org>,Sascha > Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de>,Pengutronix Kernel Team > <ker...@pengutronix.de>,Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com>,NXP Linux Team > <linux-...@nxp.com>,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org,linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org,opensource.ker...@vivo.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] drivers/tty: delete break after return or goto>On > Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 02:53:29AM -0800, Bernard Zhao wrote: > >> This patch sereies optimise code like: > >> { > >> case XXX: > >> return XXX; > >> break; //The break is meanless, so just delete it. > >> case YYY: > >> goto YYY; > >> break; //The break is meanless, so just delete it. > >> ...... > >> } > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bern...@vivo.com> > >> > >> --- > >> Bernard Zhao (2): > >> drivers/tty/nozomi.c: delete no use break after goto > >> drivers/tty/serial/imx.c: delete no use break after return > > > >That is not the subject of the patches you sent out, what broke? > > Hi: > > I am sorry that I am a little confused: > The patch series`s subject is "drivers/tty: delete break after return or goto" > and the blurb is: > This patch sereies optimise code like: > { > case XXX: > return XXX; > break; //The break is meanless, so just delete it. > case YYY: > goto YYY; > break; //The break is meanless, so just delete it. > ...... > } > last, the modified files are: > Bernard Zhao (2): > drivers/tty/nozomi.c: delete no use break after goto > drivers/tty/serial/imx.c: delete no use break after return > > Is there something wrong that I didn`t catch?
The above lines do not match up with the subject lines of the patches you sent out, so something went wrong. thanks, greg k-h