On 04/11/2020 10:49, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 04.11.2020 12:23, Jon Hunter пишет:
>> Deferred probe is an expected return value for tegra_output_probe().
>> Given that the driver deals with it properly, there's no need to output
>> a warning that may potentially confuse users.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonath...@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since V1:
>> - This time, I actually validated it!
>>
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c | 7 +++----
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c
>> index e88a17c2937f..898a80ca37fa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/sor.c
>> @@ -3764,10 +3764,9 @@ static int tegra_sor_probe(struct platform_device 
>> *pdev)
>>              return err;
>>  
>>      err = tegra_output_probe(&sor->output);
>> -    if (err < 0) {
>> -            dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to probe output: %d\n", err);
>> -            return err;
>> -    }
>> +    if (err < 0)
>> +            return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, err,
>> +                                 "failed to probe output: %d\n", err);
> 
> Hello Jon,
> 
> There is no need to duplicate the error code in the message [1]. Perhaps
> worth making a v3? :)
Indeed! Thanks for catching. Trying to do to many things at the same
time. I should have learned by now!

Jon

-- 
nvpublic

Reply via email to