On Tue 03 Nov 2020 at 04:48, Tian Tao <tiant...@hisilicon.com> wrote:

> The code has been in a irq-disabled context since it is hard IRQ. There
> is no necessity to do it again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <tiant...@hisilicon.com>

Reviewed-by: Jerome Brunet <jbru...@baylibre.com>

> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c 
> b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c
> index 1c5299c..d4a4891 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c
> @@ -418,10 +418,9 @@ static irqreturn_t meson_mx_mmc_irq(int irq, void *data)
>  {
>       struct meson_mx_mmc_host *host = (void *) data;
>       u32 irqs, send;
> -     unsigned long irqflags;
>       irqreturn_t ret;
>  
> -     spin_lock_irqsave(&host->irq_lock, irqflags);
> +     spin_lock(&host->irq_lock);
>  
>       irqs = readl(host->base + MESON_MX_SDIO_IRQS);
>       send = readl(host->base + MESON_MX_SDIO_SEND);
> @@ -434,7 +433,7 @@ static irqreturn_t meson_mx_mmc_irq(int irq, void *data)
>       /* finally ACK all pending interrupts */
>       writel(irqs, host->base + MESON_MX_SDIO_IRQS);
>  
> -     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->irq_lock, irqflags);
> +     spin_unlock(&host->irq_lock);
>  
>       return ret;
>  }

Reply via email to