On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:44:41 -0800 "Brett T. Warden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Setting aggressive=1 bypasses the friendly auto-detection by polling the > status register, and instead attempts to initialize the qcam directly. Not > friendly to other parallel devices, but much more reliable than the > auto-detection. Someone still has a bw-qcam device ? The status polling ought to be rock solid - what values do you see ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
