> I am sorry, i don't understand how this is related to the semantics of > e.g. longjmp. But, i am sure my patch solves all overflows. Ingo's patch > can't catch the overflow which is caught by "int i[1000];" in the handler > function.
Please read the long explanation I wrote, which Ingo forwarded. Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/