On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:13:20AM +0800, Zou Wei wrote: > Fix the following sparse warning: > > arch/mips/mm/hugetlbpage.c:64:5: warning: > symbol 'is_aligned_hugepage_range' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hul...@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_...@huawei.com> > --- > arch/mips/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/mips/mm/hugetlbpage.c > index 77ffece..774c988 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/mm/hugetlbpage.c > +++ b/arch/mips/mm/hugetlbpage.c > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long > addr, > /* > * This function checks for proper alignment of input addr and len > parameters. > */ > -int is_aligned_hugepage_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len) > +static int is_aligned_hugepage_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len)
this should give then a warning that 'is_aligned_hugepage_range' is unused. Could you send a patch, which remove function completely ? Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
