On 11/7/2020 4:55 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 01:21:39PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote:
we compared the tmpfs.ops_per_sec: (363 / 103.02) between this commit and
parent commit.
Thanks! I see about a 50% hit on my system, and this patch restores the
performance. Can you verify this works for you?
diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index 9b065d412e5f..e602333f8c0d 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static void force_shm_swapin_readahead(struct
vm_area_struct *vma,
struct address_space *mapping)
{
XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, linear_page_index(vma, start));
- pgoff_t end_index = end / PAGE_SIZE;
+ pgoff_t end_index = linear_page_index(vma, end + PAGE_SIZE - 1);
struct page *page;
rcu_read_lock();
_______________________________________________
LKP mailing list -- l...@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to lkp-le...@lists.01.org
I test the patch, the regression is disappeared.
=========================================================================================
tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/nr_threads/disk/testtime/class/cpufreq_governor/ucode:
lkp-csl-2sp3/stress-ng/debian-10.4-x86_64-20200603.cgz/x86_64-rhel-8.3/gcc-9/100%/1HDD/100s/memory/performance/0x400002c
commit:
f5df8635c5a3c912919c91be64aa198554b0f9ed
e6e88712e43b7942df451508aafc2f083266f56b
6bc25f0c5e0d55145f7ef087adea2693802a80f3 (this test patch)
f5df8635c5a3c912 e6e88712e43b7942df451508aaf 6bc25f0c5e0d55145f7ef087ade
---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev
\ | \ | \
1198 ± 4% -69.7% 362.67 +3.3% 1238 ±
3% stress-ng.tmpfs.ops
11.62 ± 4% -69.7% 3.52 +3.4% 12.02 ±
3% stress-ng.tmpfs.ops_per_sec
--
Zhengjun Xing
