On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 17:40:55 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Renzo Davoli) wrote: > > WHAT WE NEED FROM THE LINUX KERNEL COMMUNITY > -------------------------------------------- > 0- (Constructive) comments. > > 1- The "official" assignment of an Address Family. > (It is enough for everything but interface grabbing, see 2) > > in include/linux/net.h: > - #define NPROTO 34 /* should be enough for now.. */ > + #define NPROTO 35 /* should be enough for now.. */ > > in include/linux/socket.h > + #define AF_IPN 34 > + #define PF_IPN AF_IPN > - #define AF_MAX 34 /* For now.. */ > + #define AF_MAX 35 /* For now.. */ > > This seems to be quite simple. > > 2- Another "grabbing hook" for interfaces (like the ones already > existing for the kernel bridge and for the macvlan). > > In include/linux/netdevice.h: > among the fields of struct net_device: > > /* bridge stuff */ > struct net_bridge_port *br_port; > /* macvlan */ > struct macvlan_port *macvlan_port; > + /* ipn */ > + struct ipn_node *ipn_port; > > /* class/net/name entry */ > struct device dev; > > In net/core/dev.c, we need another section for grabbing packets.... > like the ones defined for CONFIG_BRIDGE and CONFIG_MACVLAN. > I can write the patch (it needs just tens of minutes of cut&paste). > We are studying some way to register/deregister grabbing services, > I feel this would be the cleanest way. > > WHERE? > ------ > There is an experimental version in the VDE svn tree. > http://sourceforge.net/projects/vde >
Post complete source code for kernel part to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you want the hooks, you need to include the full source code for inclusion in mainline. All the Documentation/SubmittingPatches rules apply; you can't just ask for "facilitators" and expect to keep your stuff out of tree. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/