On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> do_signal_stop() counts all sub-thread and sets ->group_stop_count 
> accordingly.
> Every thread should decrement ->group_stop_count and stop, the last one should
> notify the parent.
> 
> However a sub-thread can exit before it notices the signal_pending(), or it 
> may
> be somewhere in do_exit() already. In that case the group stop never finishes
> properly.
> 
> Note: this is a minimal fix, we can add some optimizations later. Say we can
> return quickly if thread_group_empty(). Also, we can move some signal related
> code from exit_notify() to exit_signals().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Looks OK for me, even though we're doing more work on the exit path. OTOH 
I don't see a non-racy way of doing it w/out grabbing the lock. Did you 
try to bench how much this change costs?
Anyway, looks sane to me...

Acked-by: Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



- Davide


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to