* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:26:49 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > * Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > >     So while the irq compression code on i386 should really
> > >     be deleted -- even before merging the x86_64 irq-overhaul,
> > >     this patch simply disables it on all high volume systems
> > >     to avoid problems #1 and #2 on most all i386 systems.
> > >     
> > >     A large system with pin numbers >=64 will still have compression
> > >     to conserve limited IRQ numbers for sparse IOAPICS.  However,
> > >     the vast majority of the planet, those with only pin numbers < 64
> > >     will use an identity GSI -> IRQ mapping.
> > >     
> > >     Signed-off-by: Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > thanks for the patch and the extensive description. I've applied this to 
> > x86.git.
> 
> Len applied it to his tree too.

Len, i think this belongs into x86.git a bit more (especially with the 
unification activities going on all around the tree) - do you agree? 
Andrew, i'd suggest to apply a reverted patch to between git.acpi and 
git.x86 until this gets sorted out.

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to