Hi Viresh,
On 10.11.2020 07:00, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 09-11-20, 13:42, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> This patch landed in linux next-20201109 as commit e8f7703f8fe5
>> ("cpufreq: dt: Don't (ab)use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to create OPP
>> table"). Sadly it causes regression on some Samsung Exynos based boards:
>>
>> 8<--- cut here ---
>> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffff37
>> pgd = (ptrval)
>> [ffffff37] *pgd=4ffff841, *pte=00000000, *ppte=00000000
>> Internal error: Oops: 27 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ARM
>> Modules linked in:
>> usb 3-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
>> CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.10.0-rc1-00007-ge8f7703f8fe5
>> #1908
>> Hardware name: Samsung Exynos (Flattened Device Tree)
>> PC is at dev_pm_opp_put_regulators+0x8/0xf0
>> LR is at dt_cpufreq_probe+0x19c/0x3fc
> Does this fix it for you ?
Yes, thanks!
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
> index 66b3db5efb53..5aa3d4e3140d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static int dt_cpufreq_early_init(struct device *dev, int
> cpu)
> if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> dev_err(cpu_dev, "failed to set regulators:
> %d\n",
> ret);
> - goto out;
> + goto free_cpumask;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ static int dt_cpufreq_early_init(struct device *dev, int
> cpu)
> dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(priv->cpus);
> if (priv->opp_table)
> dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(priv->opp_table);
> +free_cpumask:
> free_cpumask_var(priv->cpus);
> return ret;
> }
>
>
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
