On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 01:30:40PM +0530, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote:
>
> On 11/10/2020 11:46 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 05:49:58PM +0530, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote:
> > > Exact caller of memblock_phys_alloc_range is not available with
> > > "memblock=debug". Below information is not enough for memory accounting.
> > > for example:
> > > [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0x000000023fc6b000-0x000000023fc6bfff]
> > > memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xc0/0x188
> > >
> > > To enhance the memblock_dbg information or to get the exact owner of the
> > > memblock_reserve, add debug logs in memblock_phys_alloc_range function.
> > Why would you want to use memblock=debug for memory accounting or for
> > tracking of the owners of the reserved memory?
> We do memblock reserved accounting to track owners to know size of memory
> allocated by different drivers/owners through memblock_reserve, which help
> in comparing different kernel version and in optimizations.
I'd suggest to update the commit messaget to somthing like:
It is usefull to know the exact caller of memblock_phys_alloc_range() to
track early memory reservations during developement.
Currently, when memblock debugging is enabled, the allocations done with
memblock_phys_alloc_range() are only reported at memblock_reserve():
[ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0x000000023fc6b000-0x000000023fc6bfff]
memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xc0/0x188
Add memblock_dbg() to memblock_phys_alloc_range() to get details about
its usage.
For example:
[ 0.000000] memblock_phys_alloc_range: 4096 bytes align=0x1000
from=0x0000000000000000 max_addr=0x0000000000000000
early_pgtable_alloc+0x24/0x178
[ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0x000000023fc6b000-0x000000023fc6bfff]
memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xc0/0x188
> > > After adding logs:
> > > [ 0.000000] memblock_phys_alloc_range: 4096 bytes align=0x1000
> > > from=0x0000000000000000 max_addr=0x0000000000000000
> > > early_pgtable_alloc+0x24/0x178
> > > [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0x000000023fc6b000-0x000000023fc6bfff]
> > > memblock_alloc_range_nid+0xc0/0x188
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Faiyaz Mohammed <faiy...@codeaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > > mm/memblock.c | 3 +++
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> > > index 049df41..f65af9f 100644
> > > --- a/mm/memblock.c
> > > +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> > > @@ -1419,6 +1419,9 @@ phys_addr_t __init
> > > memblock_phys_alloc_range(phys_addr_t size,
> > > phys_addr_t start,
> > > phys_addr_t end)
> > > {
> > > + memblock_dbg("%s: %llu bytes align=0x%llx from=%pa max_addr=%pa %pS\n",
> > > + __func__, (u64)size, (u64)align, &start, &end,
> > > + (void *)_RET_IP_);
> > > return memblock_alloc_range_nid(size, align, start, end,
> > > NUMA_NO_NODE,
> > > false);
> > > }
> > > --
> > > QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
> > > member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
> > >
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
