On 11/11/20 1:12 AM, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> In order to account for any potential overflows that could occur.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardel...@analog.com>

Thinking about it, this can only really happen if the user provides
excessive values for limit attributes. Those are currently clamped
later, after the conversion. I think it would be better to modify
the code to apply a clamp _before_ the conversion as well instead
of trying to solve the overflow problem with unsigned long long.

Either case, can you send me a register dump for this chip ?
I'd like to write a module test script to actually check if there
are any over/underflows or other problems.

Thanks,
Guenter

> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/ltc2945.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ltc2945.c b/drivers/hwmon/ltc2945.c
> index 1cea710df668..6d4569a25471 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/ltc2945.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/ltc2945.c
> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static long long ltc2945_reg_to_val(struct device *dev, 
> u8 reg)
>  }
>  
>  static int ltc2945_val_to_reg(struct device *dev, u8 reg,
> -                           unsigned long val)
> +                           unsigned long long val)
>  {
>       struct ltc2945_state *st = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>       struct regmap *regmap = st->regmap;
> @@ -181,14 +181,14 @@ static int ltc2945_val_to_reg(struct device *dev, u8 
> reg,
>                       return ret;
>               if (control & CONTROL_MULT_SELECT) {
>                       /* 25 mV * 25 uV = 0.625 uV resolution. */
> -                     val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(val, 625);
> +                     val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(val, 625);
>               } else {
>                       /*
>                        * 0.5 mV * 25 uV = 0.0125 uV resolution.
>                        * Divide first to avoid overflow;
>                        * accept loss of accuracy.
>                        */
> -                     val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(val, 25) * 2;
> +                     val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(val, 25) * 2;
>               }
>               break;
>       case LTC2945_VIN_H:
> @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ static int ltc2945_val_to_reg(struct device *dev, u8 reg,
>       case LTC2945_MAX_VIN_THRES_H:
>       case LTC2945_MIN_VIN_THRES_H:
>               /* 25 mV resolution. */
> -             val /= 25;
> +             val = div_u64(val, 25);
>               break;
>       case LTC2945_ADIN_H:
>       case LTC2945_MAX_ADIN_H:
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static int ltc2945_val_to_reg(struct device *dev, u8 reg,
>                * dividing the reported current by the sense resistor value
>                * in mOhm.
>                */
> -             val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(val, 25);
> +             val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(val, 25);
>               break;
>       default:
>               return -EINVAL;
> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static ssize_t ltc2945_value_store(struct device *dev,
>       struct ltc2945_state *st = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>       struct regmap *regmap = st->regmap;
>       u8 reg = attr->index;
> -     unsigned long val;
> +     unsigned long long val;
>       u8 regbuf[3];
>       int num_regs;
>       int regval;
> 

Reply via email to