On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 07:11:35PM +0800, Zhang Changzhong wrote:
> Fix missing clk_disable_unprepare() before return from
> gswip_gphy_fw_load() in the error handling case.
> 
> Fixes: 14fceff4771e ("net: dsa: Add Lantiq / Intel DSA driver for vrx200")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hul...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzh...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c
> index 74db81d..8936d65 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq_gswip.c
> @@ -1682,6 +1682,7 @@ static int gswip_gphy_fw_load(struct gswip_priv *priv, 
> struct gswip_gphy_fw *gph
>       if (ret) {
>               dev_err(dev, "failed to load firmware: %s, error: %i\n",
>                       gphy_fw->fw_name, ret);
> +             clk_disable_unprepare(gphy_fw->clk_gate);
>               return ret;
>       }
>  
> @@ -1698,14 +1699,17 @@ static int gswip_gphy_fw_load(struct gswip_priv 
> *priv, struct gswip_gphy_fw *gph
>       } else {
>               dev_err(dev, "failed to alloc firmware memory\n");
>               release_firmware(fw);
> +             clk_disable_unprepare(gphy_fw->clk_gate);
>               return -ENOMEM;
>       }
>  
>       release_firmware(fw);
>  
>       ret = regmap_write(priv->rcu_regmap, gphy_fw->fw_addr_offset, dev_addr);
> -     if (ret)
> +     if (ret) {
> +             clk_disable_unprepare(gphy_fw->clk_gate);
>               return ret;
> +     }
>  
>       reset_control_deassert(gphy_fw->reset);
>  
> -- 
> 2.9.5
> 

gswip_gphy_fw_list
-> gswip_gphy_fw_probe
   -> gswip_gphy_fw_load
      -> clk_prepare_enable
      -> then fails

Then gswip_gphy_fw_list does this:
        for_each_available_child_of_node(gphy_fw_list_np, gphy_fw_np) {
                err = gswip_gphy_fw_probe(priv, &priv->gphy_fw[i],
                                          gphy_fw_np, i);
                if (err)
                        goto remove_gphy;
                i++;
        }

        return 0;

remove_gphy:
        for (i = 0; i < priv->num_gphy_fw; i++)
                gswip_gphy_fw_remove(priv, &priv->gphy_fw[i]);


Then gswip_gphy_fw_remove does this:
gswip_gphy_fw_remove
-> clk_disable_unprepare

What's wrong with this?

Reply via email to