On 11/12/20 11:02 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, santosh.shilim...@oracle.com wrote:
On 11/12/20 5:21 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 12/11/2020 12:31, Lee Jones wrote:
Cc:ing a few people I know.
On Tue, 03 Nov 2020, Lee Jones wrote:
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c: In function ‘knav_setup_queue_pools’:
drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c:1310:6: warning: variable ‘ret’ set but
not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssant...@kernel.org>
Cc: Sandeep Nair <sandee...@ti.com>
Cc: Cyril Chemparathy <cy...@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>
---
drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Any idea who will take these TI patches?
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201111052540.gh173...@builder.lan/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KEeMCT-GwmLNnDFCOqxnunXXiCrCpj3ZFXpiMzj55VmlOJ-FVhKmom-O7sq-CkL8s0sjAg$
(Dropped a few inactive emails from delivery.)
Santosh is the maintainer for the subsystem, so my vote would go for him.
Thanks for your prompt reply Tero.
It looks as though Santosh has been on Cc since the start. He must
just be busy. I'll give him a little while longer before submitting a
[RESEND].
Go ahead and re-post. These seems to be trivial so will pick
it up.
If you are in receipt of the first iteration, there shouldn't be any
requirement for a [RESEND]. Unless you deleted them from your inbox?
I haven't deleted anything. I thought you are going to repost based
on "I'll give him a little while longer before submitting a [RESEND]"
:-)
Regards,
Santosh
Regards,
Santosh
