* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - t = printk_clock(); > > + t = cpu_clock(printk_cpu); > > nanosec_rem = do_div(t, 1000000000); > > tlen = sprintf(tbuf, > > "<%c>[%5lu.%06lu] ", > > A bit risky - it's quite an expansion of code which no longer can call > printk. > > You might want to take that WARN_ON out of __update_rq_clock() ;)
hm, dont we already detect printk recursions and turn them into a silent return instead of a hang/crash? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/