On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 7:54 AM Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > OK, I think I understand what's going on. Could you check if > reverting the variant in -next and applying the following instead > fixes what you are seeing?
Side note: if this ends up working, can you add a lot of comments
about this thing (both in the code and the commit message)? It
confused both Christoph and me, and clearly you were stumped too.
That's not a great sign.
Linus
