From: Mike Leach <mike.le...@linaro.org>

commit 39a7661dcf655c8198fd5d72412f5030a8e58444 upstream.

Commit [bb1860efc817] changed the sink handling code introducing an
uninitialised pointer bug. This results in the default sink selection
failing.

Prior to commit:

static void etm_setup_aux(...)

<snip>
        struct coresight_device *sink;
<snip>

        /* First get the selected sink from user space. */
        if (event->attr.config2) {
                id = (u32)event->attr.config2;
                sink = coresight_get_sink_by_id(id);
        } else {
                sink = coresight_get_enabled_sink(true);
        }
<ctd>

*sink always initialised - possibly to NULL which triggers the
automatic sink selection.

After commit:

static void etm_setup_aux(...)

<snip>
        struct coresight_device *sink;
<snip>

        /* First get the selected sink from user space. */
        if (event->attr.config2) {
                id = (u32)event->attr.config2;
                sink = coresight_get_sink_by_id(id);
        }
<ctd>

*sink pointer uninitialised when not providing a sink on the perf command
line. This breaks later checks to enable automatic sink selection.

Fixes: bb1860efc817 ("coresight: etm: perf: Sink selection using sysfs is 
deprecated")
Signed-off-by: Mike Leach <mike.le...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poir...@linaro.org>
Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201029164559.1268531-3-mathieu.poir...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static void *etm_setup_aux(struct perf_e
        u32 id;
        int cpu = event->cpu;
        cpumask_t *mask;
-       struct coresight_device *sink;
+       struct coresight_device *sink = NULL;
        struct etm_event_data *event_data = NULL;
 
        event_data = alloc_event_data(cpu);


Reply via email to