From: Kan Liang <kan.li...@linux.intel.com>

Extend sample-parsing test cases to support new sample type
PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.li...@linux.intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c 
b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
index a0bdaf390ac8..6baed165c850 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
@@ -154,6 +154,9 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
        if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_CGROUP)
                COMP(cgroup);
 
+       if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE)
+               COMP(data_page_size);
+
        if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_AUX) {
                COMP(aux_sample.size);
                if (memcmp(s1->aux_sample.data, s2->aux_sample.data,
@@ -234,6 +237,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs, u64 
read_format)
                },
                .phys_addr      = 113,
                .cgroup         = 114,
+               .data_page_size = 4096,
                .aux_sample     = {
                        .size   = sizeof(aux_data),
                        .data   = (void *)aux_data,
@@ -340,7 +344,7 @@ int test__sample_parsing(struct test *test __maybe_unused, 
int subtest __maybe_u
         * were added.  Please actually update the test rather than just change
         * the condition below.
         */
-       if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_CGROUP << 1) {
+       if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE << 1) {
                pr_debug("sample format has changed, some new PERF_SAMPLE_ bit 
was introduced - test needs updating\n");
                return -1;
        }
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to