On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:46:26PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > +#define ____PVOP_CALL(rettype, op, clbr, call_clbr, extra_clbr, ...) \ > ({ \ > PVOP_CALL_ARGS; \ > PVOP_TEST_NULL(op); \ > + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(rettype) > sizeof(unsigned long)); \ > + asm volatile(paravirt_alt(PARAVIRT_CALL) \ > + : call_clbr, ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT \ > + : paravirt_type(op), \ > + paravirt_clobber(clbr), \ > + ##__VA_ARGS__ \ > + : "memory", "cc" extra_clbr); \ > + (rettype)(__eax & PVOP_RETMASK(rettype)); \ > })
This is now very similar to ____PVOP_VCALL() (note how PVOP_CALL_ARGS is PVOP_VCALL_ARGS). Could we get away with doing something horrible like: #define ____PVOP_VCALL(X...) (void)____PVOP_CALL(long, X) ?