Hi, I don't know this code, but:
On 11/20/20 4:33 PM, XiaoLi Feng wrote: > From: Xiaoli Feng <fengxiaoli0...@gmail.com> > > keep attributes and attributes_mask are consistent for > STATX_ATTR_DAX. > --- > fs/stat.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/stat.c b/fs/stat.c > index dacecdda2e79..914a61d256b0 100644 > --- a/fs/stat.c > +++ b/fs/stat.c > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ int vfs_getattr_nosec(const struct path *path, struct kstat > *stat, > > if (IS_DAX(inode)) > stat->attributes |= STATX_ATTR_DAX; > - > + stat->attributes_mask |= STATX_ATTR_DAX; Why shouldn't that be: if (IS_DAX(inode)) stat->attributes_mask |= STATX_ATTR_DAX; or combine them, like this: if (IS_DAX(inode)) { stat->attributes |= STATX_ATTR_DAX; stat->attributes_mask |= STATX_ATTR_DAX; } and no need to delete that blank line. > if (inode->i_op->getattr) > return inode->i_op->getattr(path, stat, request_mask, > query_flags); > thanks. -- ~Randy