From: Can Guo <c...@codeaurora.org>

[ Upstream commit da3fecb0040324c08f1587e5bff1f15f36be1872 ]

The scsi_block_reqs_cnt increased in ufshcd_hold() is supposed to be
decreased back in ufshcd_ungate_work() in a paired way. However, if
specific ufshcd_hold/release sequences are met, it is possible that
scsi_block_reqs_cnt is increased twice but only one ungate work is
queued. To make sure scsi_block_reqs_cnt is handled by ufshcd_hold() and
ufshcd_ungate_work() in a paired way, increase it only if queue_work()
returns true.

Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/1604384682-15837-2-git-send-email-c...@codeaurora.org
Reviewed-by: Hongwu Su <hong...@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu <stanley....@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <bean...@micron.com>
Signed-off-by: Can Guo <c...@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.peter...@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index b2cbdd01ab10b..a63119c35fde8 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1592,12 +1592,12 @@ int ufshcd_hold(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool async)
                 * work and to enable clocks.
                 */
        case CLKS_OFF:
-               ufshcd_scsi_block_requests(hba);
                hba->clk_gating.state = REQ_CLKS_ON;
                trace_ufshcd_clk_gating(dev_name(hba->dev),
                                        hba->clk_gating.state);
-               queue_work(hba->clk_gating.clk_gating_workq,
-                          &hba->clk_gating.ungate_work);
+               if (queue_work(hba->clk_gating.clk_gating_workq,
+                              &hba->clk_gating.ungate_work))
+                       ufshcd_scsi_block_requests(hba);
                /*
                 * fall through to check if we should wait for this
                 * work to be done or not.
-- 
2.27.0



Reply via email to