Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:55:33PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>   
>> +#define set_pte_atomic(pteptr, pteval)              set_pte(pteptr,pteval)
>> +#define set_pte_present(mm,addr,ptep,pteval)        
>> set_pte_at(mm,addr,ptep,pteval)
>>  
>> +#define pte_clear(mm,addr,xp)                               \
>> +    do {                                            \
>> +            set_pte_at(mm, addr, xp, __pte(0));     \
>> +    } while (0)
>> +
>>  #undef pmd_clear
>> +#define pmd_clear(xp)                               \
>> +    do {                                    \
>> +            set_pmd(xp, __pmd(0));          \
>> +    } while (0)
>>     
>
> What about turning these into inline functions to get better type
> checking?
>   

I'll give it a go.  Some of these need to be macros because of #include
hell; I'm not sure if that applies to these ones.

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to