On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:17:15 +0000 Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 07:54:33PM +0200, stef...@marvell.com wrote: > > From: Stefan Chulski <stef...@marvell.com> > > > > Tx/Rx FIFO is a HW resource limited by total size, but shared > > by all ports of same CP110 and impacting port-performance. > > Do not divide the FIFO for ports which are not enabled in DTS, > > so active ports could have more FIFO. > > No change in FIFO allocation if all 3 ports on the communication > > processor enabled in DTS. > > > > The active port mapping should be done in probe before FIFO-init. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Chulski <stef...@marvell.com> > > Thanks. > > Reviewed-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@armlinux.org.uk> > > One thing I didn't point out is that netdev would like patch submissions > to indicate which tree they are targetting. Are you intending this for > net or net-next? > > [PATCH net vX] ... > > or > > [PATCH net-next vX] ... > > in the subject line please.
I'll assume Stefan does not know :) This patches does not appear to fix a bug or other user-visible issue, so applying to net-next, it will be part of the next Linux release (5.11) and not queued to LTS. Thanks!
