On 25/11/20 5:36 am, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Since we only need a single u64 the _array form is
> unnecessarily. Use device_property_read_u64 instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.lin...@arm.com>

Thank you :-)

Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index feba64fbde16..ad4ae88a7f74 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -3992,10 +3992,10 @@ void __sdhci_read_caps(struct sdhci_host *host, const 
> u16 *ver,
>       if (host->v4_mode)
>               sdhci_do_enable_v4_mode(host);
>  
> -     device_property_read_u64_array(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> -                                    "sdhci-caps-mask", &dt_caps_mask, 1);
> -     device_property_read_u64_array(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> -                                    "sdhci-caps", &dt_caps, 1);
> +     device_property_read_u64(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> +                              "sdhci-caps-mask", &dt_caps_mask);
> +     device_property_read_u64(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
> +                              "sdhci-caps", &dt_caps);
>  
>       v = ver ? *ver : sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_VERSION);
>       host->version = (v & SDHCI_SPEC_VER_MASK) >> SDHCI_SPEC_VER_SHIFT;
> 

Reply via email to