On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 08:09:21PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> The commit 3966c3feca3f ("x86/perf/amd: Remove need to check "running"
> bit in NMI handler") introduced this.  It seems x86_pmu_stop can be
> called recursively (like when it losts some samples) like below:
> 
>   x86_pmu_stop
>     intel_pmu_disable_event  (x86_pmu_disable)
>       intel_pmu_pebs_disable
>         intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm  (x86_pmu_drain_pebs_buffer)
>           x86_pmu_stop
> 
> While commit 35d1ce6bec13 ("perf/x86/intel/ds: Fix x86_pmu_stop
> warning for large PEBS") fixed it for the normal cases, there's
> another path to call x86_pmu_stop() recursively when a PEBS error was
> detected (like two or more counters overflowed at the same time).
> 
> Like in the Kan's previous fix, we can skip the interrupt accounting
> for large PEBS, so check the iregs which is set for PMI only.
> 
> Fixes: 3966c3feca3f ("x86/perf/amd: Remove need to check "running" bit in NMI 
> handler")
> Reported-by: John Sperbeck <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Lendacky, Thomas" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kan Liang <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>

Thanks for both!

Reply via email to