On 26/11/2020 15:02, Lukasz Luba wrote: [ ... ]
>>> changed via sysfs. >>> >>> Could you take it please? It should apply smoothly in your tree. >> >> Actually, I'm waiting for Ionela and Dietmar ack. >> >> > > Are they maintainers of this file that you need their ACKs? > Maybe I should drop mine then. Ok let me clarify :) In general when someone comments on the changes, I usually wait for the consensus before merging the patches. If the persons who commented before are unresponsive, depending on the context and my perception, I apply the changes or not. I'm giving the opportunity to Ionela to review the series again as she commented the previous version (and gave a reviewed-by). I thought also Dietmar commented the series but apparently I was wrong. As you stated, you are the maintainer of the subsystem, so if there are no acked-by or reviewed-by, the series will be applied anyway soon. Meanwhile, they are in the 'testing' branch of the tree, the antechamber of 'linux-next' and 'next' ;) -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
