Hello, On Fri, Nov 27, 2020, at 02:12, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26 2020 at 09:47, Laurențiu Nicola wrote: > > These messages are described as warnings in the MSI code. > > Where and what has MSI to do with these messages?
There's a comment referring to it as a warning, but an error seemed a more appropriate severity: * If the vector is unused, then it is marked so it won't * trigger the 'No irq handler for vector' warning in * common_interrupt(). > > Spotted because they break quiet boot on a Ryzen 5000 CPU. > > They don't break the boot. > > The machine boots fine, but having interrupts raised on a vector which > is unused is really bad. That's right, sorry. It still boots, but it's no longer "quiet", that's what I meant. > Can you please provide the actual message from dmesg? Sure: [ 0.316902] __common_interrupt: 1.55 No irq handler for vector [ 0.316902] __common_interrupt: 2.55 No irq handler for vector [ 0.316902] __common_interrupt: 3.55 No irq handler for vector [ 0.316902] __common_interrupt: 4.55 No irq handler for vector [ 0.316902] __common_interrupt: 5.55 No irq handler for vector [ 0.316902] __common_interrupt: 6.55 No irq handler for vector [ 0.316902] __common_interrupt: 7.55 No irq handler for vector [ 0.316902] __common_interrupt: 8.55 No irq handler for vector [ 0.316902] __common_interrupt: 9.55 No irq handler for vector [ 0.316902] __common_interrupt: 10.55 No irq handler for vector These only show up during boot (and not e.g. when a disabling and enabling again a CPU). Laurențiu