On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 18:02 -0800, Michael Rubin wrote:
> From: Michael Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Fixing a bug where writing to large files while concurrently writing to
> smaller ones creates a situation where writeback cannot keep up with the
> traffic and memory baloons until the we hit the threshold watermark. This
> can result in surprising latency spikes when syncing. This latency
> can take minutes on large memory systems. Upon request I can provide
> a test to reproduce this situation.

The part I miss here is the rationale on _how_ you solve the problem.

The patch itself is simple enough, but I've been staring at this code
for a while now, and I'm just not getting it.

> The only concern I have is that this makes the wb_kupdate slightly more
> agressive. I am not sure it is enough to cause any problems. I think
> there is enough checks to throttle the background activity.
> 
> Feng also the one line change that you recommended here 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119629655402153&w=2 had no effect.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> Index: 2624rc3_feng/fs/fs-writeback.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 2624rc3_feng.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c       2007-11-29 14:44:24.000000000 
> -0800
> +++ 2624rc3_feng/fs/fs-writeback.c    2007-12-10 17:21:45.000000000 -0800
> @@ -408,8 +408,7 @@ sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, s
>  {
>       const unsigned long start = jiffies;    /* livelock avoidance */
>  
> -     if (!wbc->for_kupdate || list_empty(&sb->s_io))
> -             queue_io(sb, wbc->older_than_this);
> +     queue_io(sb, wbc->older_than_this);
>  
>       while (!list_empty(&sb->s_io)) {
>               struct inode *inode = list_entry(sb->s_io.prev,
> Index: 2624rc3_feng/mm/page-writeback.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 2624rc3_feng.orig/mm/page-writeback.c     2007-11-16 21:16:36.000000000 
> -0800
> +++ 2624rc3_feng/mm/page-writeback.c  2007-12-10 17:37:17.000000000 -0800
> @@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ static void wb_kupdate(unsigned long arg
>               wbc.nr_to_write = MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES;
>               writeback_inodes(&wbc);
>               if (wbc.nr_to_write > 0) {
> -                     if (wbc.encountered_congestion || wbc.more_io)
> +                     if (wbc.encountered_congestion)
>                               congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
>                       else
>                               break;  /* All the old data is written */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to