Hi Daniel,

Thank you for the patch.

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:19PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> Use the software_node_unregister_nodes() helper function to unwind this
> array in a cleaner way.
> 
> Acked-by: Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrsca...@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>

> ---
> Changes since RFC v3:
> 
>       Changed the called function name - didn't drop the tags since it's
>       such a trivial change, hope that's alright!
> 
>  lib/test_printf.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/test_printf.c b/lib/test_printf.c
> index 7ac87f18a10f..7d60f24240a4 100644
> --- a/lib/test_printf.c
> +++ b/lib/test_printf.c
> @@ -644,9 +644,7 @@ static void __init fwnode_pointer(void)
>       test(second_name, "%pfwP", software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[1]));
>       test(third_name, "%pfwP", software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[2]));
>  
> -     software_node_unregister(&softnodes[2]);
> -     software_node_unregister(&softnodes[1]);
> -     software_node_unregister(&softnodes[0]);
> +     software_node_unregister_nodes(softnodes);
>  }
>  
>  static void __init

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Reply via email to