+Isaku and Xiaoyao

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 30/11/20 19:14, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > TDX also selectively blocks/skips portions of other ioctl()s so that the
> > > > TDX code itself can yell loudly if e.g. .get_cpl() is invoked.  The 
> > > > event
> > > > injection restrictions are due to direct injection not being allowed 
> > > > (except
> > > > for NMIs); all IRQs have to be routed through APICv (posted interrupts) 
> > > > and
> > > > exception injection is completely disallowed.
> > > > 
> > > >     kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_vcpu_events:
> > > >         if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.guest_state_protected)
> > > >                 events->interrupt.shadow = 
> > > > kvm_x86_ops.get_interrupt_shadow(vcpu);
> > > Perhaps an alternative implementation can enter the vCPU with immediate 
> > > exit
> > > until no events are pending, and then return all zeroes?
> > 
> > This can't work.  If the guest has STI blocking, e.g. it did STI->TDVMCALL 
> > with
> > a valid vIRQ in GUEST_RVI, then events->interrupt.shadow should technically 
> > be
> > non-zero to reflect the STI blocking.  But, the immediate exit (a hardware 
> > IRQ
> > for TDX guests) will cause VM-Exit before the guest can execute any 
> > instructions
> > and thus the guest will never clear STI blocking and never consume the 
> > pending
> > event.  Or there could be a valid vIRQ, but GUEST_RFLAGS.IF=0, in which 
> > case KVM
> > would need to run the guest for an indeterminate amount of time to wait for 
> > the
> > vIRQ to be consumed.
> 
> Delayed interrupts are fine, since they are injected according to RVI and
> the posted interrupt descriptor.  I'm thinking more of events (exceptions
> and interrupts) that caused an EPT violation exit and were recorded in the
> IDT-vectored info field.

Ah.  As is, I don't believe KVM has access to this information.  TDX-Module
handles the actual EPT violation, as well as event reinjection.  The EPT
violation reported by SEAMRET is synthesized, and IIRC the IDT-vectoring field
is not readable.

Regardless, is there an actual a problem with having a "pending" exception that
isn't reported to userspace?  Obviously the info needs to be migrated, but that
will be taken care of by virtue of migrating the VMCS.

Reply via email to