On Mon, 30 Nov 2020, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:05 AM Nicolas Pitre <n...@fluxnic.net> wrote: > > > + __rem = __n >> 32; > > *n = __res; > > return __rem; > > The above 3 statement could be: > > ``` > *n = __res; > return __n >> 32; > ```
They could. However the compiler doesn't care, and the extra line makes it more obvious that the reminder is the high part of __n. So, semantically the extra line has value. Thanks for the review. Nicolas
