On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 11:15:16PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > It is expected for ARM and ARM64 SoC related code to go through > sub-architecture maintainers. Their addresses were therefore not
I reshaped my message last moment and missed that it does not make sense anymore... It should be: "The ARM and ARM64 SoC maintainers addresses were therefore not..." Best regards, Krzysztof > documented to push patch traffic through sub-architecture maintainers. > > However when patches touch generic code, e.g. multi_v7_defconfig, the > patch might not be picked up by them and instead should go to the SoC > maintainers - Arnd and Olof. > > Add a minimal maintainer's entry for SoC covering only Makefile, so it > will not appear on most of submissions (except new devicetree boards). > It will though serve as a documentation and reference for cases when > submitter does not know where to send his SoC-related patches. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 6149066a545e..f302983645bd 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -1491,6 +1491,16 @@ F: > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu* > F: drivers/iommu/arm/ > F: drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm* > > +ARM AND ARM64 SoC SUB-ARCHITECTURES (COMMON PARTS) > +M: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> > +M: Olof Johansson <[email protected]> > +M: [email protected] > +L: [email protected] (moderated for non-subscribers) > +S: Maintained > +T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git > +F: arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile > +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile > + > ARM SUB-ARCHITECTURES > L: [email protected] (moderated for non-subscribers) > S: Maintained > -- > 2.25.1 >
