Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2020-12-02 09:49 MST:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:59:23PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
>>
>> Jerry Snitselaar @ 2020-11-30 20:26 MST:
>>
>> > Jerry Snitselaar @ 2020-11-30 19:58 MST:
>> >
>> >> When enabling the interrupt code for the tpm_tis driver we have
>> >> noticed some systems have a bios issue causing an interrupt storm to
>> >> occur. The issue isn't limited to a single tpm or system manufacturer
>> >> so keeping a denylist of systems with the issue isn't optimal. Instead
>> >> try to detect the problem occurring, disable interrupts, and revert to
>> >> polling when it happens.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jar...@kernel.org>
>> >> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@ziepe.ca>
>> >> Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhu...@gmx.de>
>> >> Cc: James Bottomley <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com>
>> >> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mj...@google.com>
>> >> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnit...@redhat.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> v2: drop tpm_tis specific workqueue and use just system_wq
>> >>
>> >> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h | 2 ++
>> >> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
>> >> b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
>> >> index 23b60583928b..72cc8a5a152c 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
>> >> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
>> >> #include <linux/wait.h>
>> >> #include <linux/acpi.h>
>> >> #include <linux/freezer.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>> >> +#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
>> >> #include "tpm.h"
>> >> #include "tpm_tis_core.h"
>> >>
>> >> @@ -745,9 +747,23 @@ static irqreturn_t tis_int_handler(int dummy, void
>> >> *dev_id)
>> >> {
>> >> struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_id;
>> >> struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
>> >> + static bool check_storm = true;
>> >> + static unsigned int check_start;
>> >> u32 interrupt;
>> >> int i, rc;
>> >>
>> >> + if (unlikely(check_storm)) {
>> >> + if (!check_start) {
>> >> + check_start = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies);
>> >> + } else if ((kstat_irqs(priv->irq) > 1000) &&
>> >> + (jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies) - check_start < 500)) {
>> >> + check_storm = false;
>> >> + schedule_work(&priv->storm_work);
>> >> + } else if (jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies) - check_start >= 500) {
>> >> + check_storm = false;
>> >> + }
>> >> + }
>> >> +
>> >> rc = tpm_tis_read32(priv, TPM_INT_STATUS(priv->locality), &interrupt);
>> >> if (rc < 0)
>> >> return IRQ_NONE;
>> >> @@ -987,6 +1003,14 @@ static const struct tpm_class_ops tpm_tis = {
>> >> .clk_enable = tpm_tis_clkrun_enable,
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> +static void tpm_tis_storm_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct tpm_tis_data *priv = container_of(work, struct tpm_tis_data,
>> >> storm_work);
>> >> +
>> >> + disable_interrupts(priv->chip);
>> >> + dev_warn(&priv->chip->dev, "Interrupt storm detected, using
>> >> polling.\n");
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct tpm_tis_data *priv, int
>> >> irq,
>> >> const struct tpm_tis_phy_ops *phy_ops,
>> >> acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle)
>> >> @@ -1003,6 +1027,9 @@ int tpm_tis_core_init(struct device *dev, struct
>> >> tpm_tis_data *priv, int irq,
>> >> if (IS_ERR(chip))
>> >> return PTR_ERR(chip);
>> >>
>> >> + priv->chip = chip;
>> >> + INIT_WORK(&priv->storm_work, tpm_tis_storm_work);
>> >> +
>> >> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> >> chip->acpi_dev_handle = acpi_dev_handle;
>> >> #endif
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
>> >> b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
>> >> index edeb5dc61c95..5630f294dc0c 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
>> >> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
>> >> @@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ struct tpm_tis_data {
>> >> u16 clkrun_enabled;
>> >> wait_queue_head_t int_queue;
>> >> wait_queue_head_t read_queue;
>> >> + struct work_struct storm_work;
>> >> + struct tpm_chip *chip;
>> >> const struct tpm_tis_phy_ops *phy_ops;
>> >> unsigned short rng_quality;
>> >> };
>> >
>> > I've tested this with the Intel platform that has an Infineon chip that
>> > I found the other week. It works, but isn't the complete fix. With this
>> > on top of James' patchset I sometimes see the message "Lost Interrupt
>> > waiting for TPM stat", so I guess there needs to be a check in
>> > wait_for_tpm_stat and request_locality to see if interrupts were
>> > disabled when the wait_event_interruptible_timeout call times out.
>>
>> As kernel test robot pointed out. kstat_irqs isn't visible when tpm_tis
>> builds as a module. It looks like it is only called by kstat_irq_usrs,
>> and that is only by the fs/proc code. I have a patch to export it, but
>> the i915 driver open codes their own version instead of using it. Is
>> there any reason not to export it?
>
> If you add a patch that exports it, then for coherency it'd be better to
> also patch i915 driver. Jani?
>
> /Jarkko
It looks like this might not solve all cases. I'm having Lenovo test
another build to make sure I gave them the right code, but they reported
with the L490 that the system hangs right when it is initializing
tpm_tis. I'm working on getting a build on the T490s I have to try there
as well. With the Intel system it spits out that it detects the
interrupt storm, and continues on its way.
