On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 12:42:08PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 6:16 PM Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > This will force a change to xfstests at a minimum. And I do know of users > > who > > have been using this value. But I have gotten inquires about using the > > feature > > so there are users out there. > > If it's only a few tests that fail, I wouldn't worry about it, and the > tests should just be updated.
Done[1] > > But if there are real user concerns, we may need to have some kind of > compat code. Because of the whole "no regressions" thing. > > What would the typical failure cases be in practice? The failure will be a user not seeing their file operating in DAX mode when they expect it to. I discussed this with Dan Williams today. He and I agreed the flag is new enough that we don't think users have any released code to the API just yet. So I think we will be ok. Also, after learning what the other flag was for I agree with Christoph that the impact is going to be minimal since users are not typically operating on the root inode. So I think we are ok with just making the change and getting it into stable quickly. Thanks, Ira [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201202214629.1563760-1-ira.we...@intel.com/
