On 14 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > And no, I don't actually hink that sendfile() is all that hot. It was > _very_ easy to implement, and can be considered a 5-minute hack to give > a feature that fit very well in the MM architecture, and that the Apache > folks had already been using on other architectures. The current sendfile() has the limitation that it can't read data from a socket. Would it be another 5-minute hack to remove this limitation, so you could sendfile between sockets? Now _that_ would be sexy :) Ben - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Anton Blanchard
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David S. Miller
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Anton Blanchard
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Pavel Machek
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? jamal
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Pavel Machek
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Andries . Brouwer
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ton Hospel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Steve VanDevender
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ton Hospel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ben Mansell
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Olivier Galibert
- RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? LA Walsh
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Rogier Wolff
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Andreas Dilger
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Russell Leighton
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Larry McVoy
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel