Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe, On 12/4/20 11:20 AM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: > Hi Jean, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54 >> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <[email protected]> >> Cc: Auger Eric <[email protected]>; wangxingang >> <[email protected]>; Xieyingtai <[email protected]>; >> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; >> [email protected]; [email protected]; >> [email protected]; [email protected]; >> [email protected]; [email protected]; >> [email protected]; [email protected]; Zengtao (B) >> <[email protected]>; qubingbing <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with >> unmanaged ASIDs >> >> Hi Shameer, >> >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: >>> Hi Jean/zhangfei, >>> Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related >> patches >>> that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin of >> Eric's series? >>> Please share your thoughts. >> >> By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches >> based on mainline? > > Yes. > > The uacce-devel branches from >> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment >> (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch >> https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.) > > Thanks. > > Hi Eric, > > Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make > sense > to rebase on top of either of those? > > From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that.
Sure. I will rebase on top of this ;-) Thanks Eric > > Thanks, > Shameer > >> Thanks, >> Jean >
