On Thu,  3 Dec 2020 22:20:17 -0800
Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org> wrote:

> Do basic editing & correction to hiddev.rst:
> - use HID instead of hid consistently

One case inline, where I think the usage of hid-core
might have been deliberate.

> - add hyphenation of multi-word adjectives
> - drop a duplicate word
> - unhyphenate "a priori"
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org>
> Cc: Jiri Kosina <ji...@kernel.org>
> Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com>
> Cc: linux-in...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <cor...@lwn.net>
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  Documentation/hid/hiddev.rst |   12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux-next-20201201.orig/Documentation/hid/hiddev.rst
> +++ linux-next-20201201/Documentation/hid/hiddev.rst
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ the following::
>                            --> hiddev.c ----> POWER / MONITOR CONTROL  
>  
>  In addition, other subsystems (apart from USB) can potentially feed
> -events into the input subsystem, but these have no effect on the hid
> +events into the input subsystem, but these have no effect on the HID
>  device interface.
>  
>  Using the HID Device Interface
> @@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ The hiddev API uses a read() interface,
>  
>  HID devices exchange data with the host computer using data
>  bundles called "reports".  Each report is divided into "fields",
> -each of which can have one or more "usages".  In the hid-core,
> -each one of these usages has a single signed 32 bit value.
> +each of which can have one or more "usages".  In the HID core,

Hmm. hid-core is (I think) kind of referring to the code in hid-core.c
Whereas a Human Interface Device core (HID core) sounds like
something different.  Not my doc though!

> +each one of these usages has a single signed 32-bit value.
>  
>  read():
>  -------
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ HIDIOCAPPLICATION
>    - (none)
>  
>  This ioctl call returns the HID application usage associated with the
> -hid device. The third argument to ioctl() specifies which application
> +HID device. The third argument to ioctl() specifies which application
>  index to get. This is useful when the device has more than one
>  application collection. If the index is invalid (greater or equal to
>  the number of application collections this device has) the ioctl
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ looked up by type (input, output or feat
>  must be filled in by the user. The ID can be absolute -- the actual
>  report id as reported by the device -- or relative --
>  HID_REPORT_ID_FIRST for the first report, and (HID_REPORT_ID_NEXT |
> -report_id) for the next report after report_id. Without a-priori
> +report_id) for the next report after report_id. Without a priori
>  information about report ids, the right way to use this ioctl is to
>  use the relative IDs above to enumerate the valid IDs. The ioctl
>  returns non-zero when there is no more next ID. The real report ID is
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ HIDIOCGUCODE
>    - struct hiddev_usage_ref (read/write)
>  
>  Returns the usage_code in a hiddev_usage_ref structure, given that
> -given its report type, report id, field index, and index within the
> +its report type, report id, field index, and index within the
>  field have already been filled into the structure.
>  
>  HIDIOCGUSAGE

Reply via email to