fre, 14 12 2007 kl. 13:31 +0100, skrev Michael Buesch: > On Friday 14 December 2007 13:16:17 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > The testers who did nothing but reported that the new driver did not > > > > work on their hardware. > > > > > > Which testers? > > > > right in this thread Ray Lee is reporting: > > > > | | Digging a little farther into it, it looks like b43 is barfing > > | | partway through init as the firmware file it's looking for has > > | | changed names. Perhaps that's the issue. I'll take a longer look at ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Ray probably has version 3 of the firmware.
> > | | this all tomorrow. > > > > you are really in denial of reality. Just re-read this thread. Upon > > re-reading this thread, try to imagine that you are in place of Ray Lee > > (might be hard), that you had a working bcm43xx driver and that now you > > try to get b43 to work. You are not a kernel hacker who knows this > > driver, just an advanced user who'd like to give you some more feedback > > about your shiny new code. > > This user did get the following messages in dmesg: > > b43err(dev->wl, "Firmware file \"%s\" not found " > "or load failed.\n", path); So the question seems to be why b43 needs version 4, when b43legacy and bcm43x uses version 3? Simon Holm Thøgersen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/