On Mon, Dec 07 2020 at 15:16, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 06:01:55PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> +void __local_bh_disable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long flags;
>> +    int newcnt;
>> +
>> +    WARN_ON_ONCE(in_hardirq());
>> +
>> +    /* First entry of a task into a BH disabled section? */
>> +    if (!current->softirq_disable_cnt) {
>> +            if (preemptible()) {
>> +                    local_lock(&softirq_ctrl.lock);
>> +                    /* Required to meet the RCU bottomhalf requirements. */
>> +                    rcu_read_lock();
>> +            } else {
>> +                    DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(this_cpu_read(softirq_ctrl.cnt));
>
> So, to be clear this adds a new constraint where we can't call
> local_bh_disable() inside a preempt disabled section? I guess the rest of the
> RT code chased all the new offenders :-)

There are not that many.

>> +            }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * Track the per CPU softirq disabled state. On RT this is per CPU
>> +     * state to allow preemption of bottom half disabled sections.
>> +     */
>> +    newcnt = __this_cpu_add_return(softirq_ctrl.cnt, cnt);
>> +    /*
>> +     * Reflect the result in the task state to prevent recursion on the
>> +     * local lock and to make softirq_count() & al work.
>> +     */
>> +    current->softirq_disable_cnt = newcnt;
>> +
>> +    if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && newcnt == cnt) {
>> +            raw_local_irq_save(flags);
>> +            lockdep_softirqs_off(ip);
>> +            raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__local_bh_disable_ip);
>> +
> [...]
>> +
>> +void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
>> +{
>> +    bool preempt_on = preemptible();
>> +    unsigned long flags;
>> +    u32 pending;
>> +    int curcnt;
>> +
>> +    WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq());
>> +    lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
>> +
>> +    local_irq_save(flags);
>> +    curcnt = this_cpu_read(softirq_ctrl.cnt);
>
> __this_cpu_read() ?

Yes.

>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * If this is not reenabling soft interrupts, no point in trying to
>> +     * run pending ones.
>> +     */
>> +    if (curcnt != cnt)
>> +            goto out;
>
> I guess you could move the local_irq_save() here?

Indeed.

Reply via email to