On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 02:20:55PM -0600, Wei Huang wrote:
> In summary, this patch is fine if Punit already verified it. My only
> concern is the list can potentially increase over the time, and we will
> keep coming back to fix override_acpi_psd() function.
Can the detection be done by looking at those _PSD things instead of
comparing f/m/s?
And, alternatively, what is this fixing?
So what if some zen2 boxes have correct _PSD objects? Why do they need
to ignore the override?
Hmmm?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
