On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:36 PM Martin Schiller <m...@dev.tdt.de> wrote:
>
> We have to take the actual link state into account to handle
> restart requests/confirms well.
>
> @@ -214,8 +241,6 @@ void x25_link_established(struct x25_neigh *nb)
> {
> switch (nb->state) {
> case X25_LINK_STATE_0:
> - nb->state = X25_LINK_STATE_2;
> - break;
> case X25_LINK_STATE_1:
> x25_transmit_restart_request(nb);
> nb->state = X25_LINK_STATE_2;
What is the reason for this change? Originally only the connecting
side will transmit a Restart Request; the connected side will not and
will only wait for the Restart Request to come. Now both sides will
transmit Restart Requests at the same time. I think we should better
avoid collision situations like this.
