Hello,

On 10/12/2020 16:01:44+0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:56:13 +0100
> 
> A local variable was used only within an if branch.
> Thus move the definition for the variable “slot” into the corresponding
> code block.
> 

What is the improvement here?

This makes the code harder to read.

> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> index 444bd3a0a922..6a0d999ee82e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
> @@ -1558,7 +1558,6 @@ static void atmci_request_end(struct atmel_mci *host, 
> struct mmc_request *mrq)
>       __releases(&host->lock)
>       __acquires(&host->lock)
>  {
> -     struct atmel_mci_slot   *slot = NULL;
>       struct mmc_host         *prev_mmc = host->cur_slot->mmc;
> 
>       WARN_ON(host->cmd || host->data);
> @@ -1579,8 +1578,9 @@ static void atmci_request_end(struct atmel_mci *host, 
> struct mmc_request *mrq)
>       host->cur_slot->mrq = NULL;
>       host->mrq = NULL;
>       if (!list_empty(&host->queue)) {
> -             slot = list_entry(host->queue.next,
> -                             struct atmel_mci_slot, queue_node);
> +             struct atmel_mci_slot *slot = list_entry(host->queue.next,
> +                                                      struct atmel_mci_slot,
> +                                                      queue_node);
>               list_del(&slot->queue_node);
>               dev_vdbg(&host->pdev->dev, "list not empty: %s is next\n",
>                               mmc_hostname(slot->mmc));
> --
> 2.29.2
> 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Reply via email to