Em Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 02:19:03PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 02:15:03PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > Em Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 05:24:30PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 08:02:20PM +0300, Alexei Budankov wrote: > > > > On 06.12.2020 20:05, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > > @@ -1952,6 +1958,8 @@ int evlist__ctlfd_process(struct evlist > > > > > *evlist, enum evlist_ctl_cmd *cmd) > > > > > char cmd_data[EVLIST_CTL_CMD_MAX_LEN]; > > > > > int ctlfd_pos = evlist->ctl_fd.pos; > > > > > struct pollfd *entries = evlist->core.pollfd.entries; > > > > > + struct evsel *evsel; > > > > > + char *evsel_name;
> > > > > if (!evlist__ctlfd_initialized(evlist) || > > > > > !entries[ctlfd_pos].revents) > > > > > return 0; > > > > > @@ -1967,6 +1975,26 @@ int evlist__ctlfd_process(struct evlist > > > > > *evlist, enum evlist_ctl_cmd *cmd) > > > > > case EVLIST_CTL_CMD_DISABLE: > > > > > evlist__disable(evlist); > > > > > break; > > > > > + case EVLIST_CTL_CMD_ENABLE_EVSEL: > > > > > + evsel_name = cmd_data + > > > > > sizeof(EVLIST_CTL_CMD_ENABLE_EVSEL_TAG) - 1; > > > > > It makes sense to check that evsel_name still points > > > > into cmd_data buffer after assigning to event name. > > > right, will add that > > So, I'm finishing test builds, so probably I'll push the first two > > patches publicly and then you can send a patch on top of this, ok? > > Unless the tests break somewhere and then I'll have to restart, so I'll > > fold in whatever gets at that time... > That was quick: > [perfbuilder@five ~]$ time dm > Thu Dec 10 01:44:52 PM -03 2020 > # export PERF_TARBALL=http://192.168.86.5/perf/perf-5.10.0-rc6.tar.xz > # dm > 1 78.47 alpine:3.4 : Ok gcc (Alpine 5.3.0) 5.3.0, > clang version 3.8.0 (tags/RELEASE_380/final) > 2 104.38 alpine:3.5 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.2.1) 6.2.1 > 20160822, clang version 3.8.1 (tags/RELEASE_381/final) > 3 105.64 alpine:3.6 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.3.0) 6.3.0, > clang version 4.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_400/final) > 4 96.52 alpine:3.7 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.4.0) 6.4.0, > Alpine clang version 5.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_500/final) (based on LLVM 5.0.0) > 5 81.08 alpine:3.8 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.4.0) 6.4.0, > Alpine clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_501/final) (based on LLVM 5.0.1) > 6 85.20 alpine:3.9 : Ok gcc (Alpine 8.3.0) 8.3.0, > Alpine clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_502/final) (based on LLVM 5.0.1) > 7 106.10 alpine:3.10 : Ok gcc (Alpine 8.3.0) 8.3.0, > Alpine clang version 8.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_800/final) (based on LLVM 8.0.0) > 8 120.20 alpine:3.11 : Ok gcc (Alpine 9.3.0) 9.3.0, > Alpine clang version 9.0.0 (https://git.alpinelinux.org/aports > f7f0d2c2b8bcd6a5843401a9a702029556492689) (based on LLVM 9.0.0) > 9 109.99 alpine:3.12 : Ok gcc (Alpine 9.3.0) 9.3.0, > Alpine clang version 10.0.0 (https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports.git > 7445adce501f8473efdb93b17b5eaf2f1445ed4c) > 10 117.76 alpine:edge : Ok gcc (Alpine 10.2.0) > 10.2.0, Alpine clang version 10.0.1 > 11 69.15 alt:p8 : Ok x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) > 5.3.1 20151207 (ALT p8 5.3.1-alt3.M80P.1), clang version 3.8.0 > (tags/RELEASE_380/final) > 12 84.55 alt:p9 : Ok x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) > 8.4.1 20200305 (ALT p9 8.4.1-alt0.p9.1), clang version 10.0.0 > 13 82.69 alt:sisyphus : Ok x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) > 9.3.1 20200518 (ALT Sisyphus 9.3.1-alt1), clang version 10.0.1 > 14 66.22 amazonlinux:1 : Ok gcc (GCC) 7.2.1 20170915 > (Red Hat 7.2.1-2), clang version 3.6.2 (tags/RELEASE_362/final) > 15 100.16 amazonlinux:2 : Ok gcc (GCC) 7.3.1 20180712 > (Red Hat 7.3.1-9), clang version 7.0.1 (Amazon Linux 2 7.0.1-1.amzn2.0.2) > 16 11.20 android-ndk:r12b-arm : FAIL arm-linux-androideabi-gcc > (GCC) 4.9.x 20150123 (prerelease) > 17 11.90 android-ndk:r15c-arm : FAIL arm-linux-androideabi-gcc > (GCC) 4.9.x 20150123 (prerelease) > 18 26.33 centos:6 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 > (Red Hat 4.4.7-23) > 19 31.80 centos:7 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 > (Red Hat 4.8.5-44) > 20 116.02 centos:8 : Ok gcc (GCC) 8.3.1 20191121 > (Red Hat 8.3.1-5), clang version 9.0.1 (Red Hat > 9.0.1-2.module_el8.2.0+309+0c7b6b03) > 21 62.27 clearlinux:latest : Ok gcc (Clear Linux OS for > Intel Architecture) 10.2.1 20201106 releases/gcc-10.2.0-475-g099857318c, > clang version 10.0.1 > 22 77.82 debian:8 : Ok gcc (Debian > 4.9.2-10+deb8u2) 4.9.2, Debian clang version 3.5.0-10 > (tags/RELEASE_350/final) (based on LLVM 3.5.0) > 23: debian:9 > > > There I go... > > [perfbuilder@five ~]$ tail -20 dm.log/android-ndk\:r12b-arm > FLEX /tmp/build/perf/util/expr-flex.c > CC /tmp/build/perf/util/pmu-bison.o > CC /tmp/build/perf/util/expr-bison.o > CC /tmp/build/perf/util/expr-flex.o > CC /tmp/build/perf/util/expr.o > CC /tmp/build/perf/util/parse-events.o > CC /tmp/build/perf/util/parse-events-flex.o > CC /tmp/build/perf/util/pmu.o > CC /tmp/build/perf/util/pmu-flex.o > LD /tmp/build/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/perf-in.o > LD /tmp/build/perf/util/perf-in.o > LD /tmp/build/perf/perf-in.o > LINK /tmp/build/perf/perf > /tmp/build/perf/perf-in.o:hist.c:function pmu_for_each_sys_event: error: > undefined reference to 'pmu_sys_event_tables' > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:659: /tmp/build/perf/perf] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:233: sub-make] Error 2 > make: *** [Makefile:70: all] Error 2 > make: Leaving directory '/git/linux/tools/perf' > + exit 1 > [perfbuilder@five ~] > > Now to figure out who generates this pmu_sys_event_tables, John? One more: [perfbuilder@five ~]$ tail -20 dm.log/debian\:experimental-x-mips64 CC /tmp/build/perf/util/expr-bison.o CC /tmp/build/perf/util/parse-events.o CC /tmp/build/perf/util/pmu.o CC /tmp/build/perf/util/parse-events-flex.o CC /tmp/build/perf/util/pmu-flex.o CC /tmp/build/perf/util/expr-flex.o CC /tmp/build/perf/util/expr.o LD /tmp/build/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/perf-in.o LD /tmp/build/perf/util/perf-in.o LD /tmp/build/perf/perf-in.o LINK /tmp/build/perf/perf /usr/lib/gcc-cross/mips64-linux-gnuabi64/9/../../../../mips64-linux-gnuabi64/bin/ld: /tmp/build/perf/perf-in.o: in function `pmu_for_each_sys_event': /git/linux/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:825: undefined reference to `pmu_sys_event_tables' /usr/lib/gcc-cross/mips64-linux-gnuabi64/9/../../../../mips64-linux-gnuabi64/bin/ld: /git/linux/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:825: undefined reference to `pmu_sys_event_tables' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:659: /tmp/build/perf/perf] Error 1 make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:233: sub-make] Error 2 make: *** [Makefile:70: all] Error 2 make: Leaving directory '/git/linux/tools/perf' + exit 1 [perfbuilder@five ~]$ And another: [perfbuilder@five ~]$ tail -20 dm.log/fedora:24-x-ARC-uClibc CC /tmp/build/perf/util/expr.o LD /tmp/build/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/perf-in.o LD /tmp/build/perf/util/perf-in.o LD /tmp/build/perf/perf-in.o LINK /tmp/build/perf/perf /tmp/build/perf/perf-in.o: In function `pmu_for_each_sys_event': /git/linux/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:816: undefined reference to `pmu_sys_event_tables' /git/linux/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:816: undefined reference to `pmu_sys_event_tables' /tmp/build/perf/perf-in.o: In function `pmu_add_sys_aliases': /git/linux/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:886: undefined reference to `pmu_sys_event_tables' /git/linux/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:886: undefined reference to `pmu_sys_event_tables' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Makefile.perf:659: recipe for target '/tmp/build/perf/perf' failed make[2]: *** [/tmp/build/perf/perf] Error 1 Makefile.perf:232: recipe for target 'sub-make' failed make[1]: *** [sub-make] Error 2 Makefile:69: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 make: Leaving directory '/git/linux/tools/perf' + exit 1 [perfbuilder@five ~]$ So far all the cross builds failed. - Arnaldo
