> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday 30 November 2020 8:21 PM
> To: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <[email protected]>; Peter Meerwald-Stadler
> <[email protected]>; Michal Simek <[email protected]>; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; Bartosz Golaszewski
> <[email protected]>; Anand Ashok Dumbre
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATH v3 0/3] iio: adc: xilinx: use even more devres
> 
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:27:56 +0100
> Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
> >
> > This is a follow-up to commit 750628c79bb1 ("iio: adc: xilinx-xadc:
> > use devm_krealloc()"). I noticed we can use even more devres helpers
> > and entirely drop the remove() callback.
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - squash three patches adding more devres calls into one for easier
> > review
> > - don't insist on the 80 characters limit
> > - add a new helper: devm_krealloc_array() and use it
> >
> > v2 -> v3:
> > - drop the devm_krealloc_array() helper
> >
> > Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
> >   iio: adc: xilinx: use helper variable for &pdev->dev
> >   iio: adc: xilinx: use devm_krealloc() instead of kfree() + kcalloc()
> >   iio: adc: xilinx: use more devres helpers and remove remove()
> >
> >  drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-xadc-core.c | 157
> > ++++++++++++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> Series looks good to me but would like to leave it a little longer to let 
> others
> take a look at it. That will probably mean it falls into next cycle now.
> 
> +CC Anand who is looking at another series touching this driver and
> +might
> give this one a spin as well.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan

Hi Jonathan, Bartosz,

I have tested and reviewed the patch and everything looks good.
I have another patch series on the same files that might cause conflicts.

Reviewed-by: Anand Ashok Dumbre <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Anand Ashok Dumbre <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Anand

Reply via email to