On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:54 AM Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 08:49:16AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 7:58 AM Vidya Sagar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Lorenzo, > > > Apologies to bug you, but wondering if you have any further comments on > > > this patch that I need to take care of? > > > > You can check the status of your patches in Patchwork: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/[email protected]/ > > > > If it's in 'New' state and delegated to Lorenzo or Bjorn, it's in > > their queue. You can shorten the queue by reviewing stuff in front of > > you. :) > > Thanks for pointing this out, this is exactly right. I *love* it when > people help review things. Obviously it saves me time, and often it > raises questions I would have missed.
I can't take credit, this was actually someone's strategy for getting their patches reviewed I heard about one time. > Even "trivial" things like spelling, grammar, whitespace, subject line > formats, etc. help because they are distractions to me and I will > comment on them or spend time fixing them myself. That doesn't mean > "repost immediately after somebody points out a typo"; it means > "collect feedback for a week or so, fix everything, *then* repost." > > This is an old but still relevant list of some of my OCD tendencies > that take no special expertise to review for: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]/ It's been on my wish list for checkpatch.pl do something like: "Commit subject should begin $(git log --oneline $files | cut -d':' -f-3 | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | head -1)". Or maybe a git commit template to fill in subject prefix and Cc list. The hard part is of course all the corner cases such as touching multiple directories/files. Rob
