On Mon, Dec 14 2020 at 12:52am -0500, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:31:47AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 03:03:29PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Ok, here it is - 5.10 is tagged and pushed out. > > > > > > I pretty much always wish that the last week was even calmer than it > > > was, and that's true here too. There's a fair amount of fixes in here, > > > including a few last-minute reverts for things that didn't get fixed, > > > but nothing makes me go "we need another week". > > > > ... > > > > > Mike Snitzer (1): > > > md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned > > > > Seems to be broken. This breaks mounting my raid6 partition: > > > > [ 87.290698] attempt to access beyond end of device > > md0: rw=4096, want=13996467328, limit=6261202944 > > [ 87.293371] attempt to access beyond end of device > > md0: rw=4096, want=13998564480, limit=6261202944 > > [ 87.296045] BTRFS warning (device md0): couldn't read tree root > > [ 87.300056] BTRFS error (device md0): open_ctree failed > > > > Reverting it goes back to the -rc7 behaviour where it mounts fine. > > If the developer/maintainer(s) agree, I can revert this and push out a > 5.10.1, just let me know. Yes, these should be reverted from 5.10 via 5.10.1: e0910c8e4f87 dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10 f075cfb1dc59 md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned They were also both marked for stable@, and I just got email stating that you've staged them both for 5.4 and 5.9, but they shouldn't go to stable@. We need to reassess and fix during 5.11. I'll now respond with my Nacked-by to each patch email relative to these commits. Thanks, Mike
