Thanks Hans

On 14/12/2020 13:31, Mark Pearson wrote:
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* December 14, 2020 13:24
> *To:* Mario Limonciello <[email protected]>; Jeff Kirsher
> <[email protected]>; Tony Nguyen <[email protected]>;
> [email protected] <[email protected]>;
> David Miller <[email protected]>; Aaron Ma <[email protected]>;
> Mark Pearson <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* [email protected] <[email protected]>;
> Netdev <[email protected]>; Alexander Duyck
> <[email protected]>; Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>; Sasha
> Netfin <[email protected]>; Aaron Brown <[email protected]>;
> Stefan Assmann <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>;
> [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* [External] Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems
> i219LM
>  
> Hi All,
> 
<snip>
> 
> ###
> 
> I've added Mark Pearson from Lenovo to the Cc so that Lenovo
> can investigate this issue further.
> 
> Mark, this thread is about an issue with enabling S0ix support for
> e1000e (i219lm) controllers. This was enabled in the kernel a
> while ago, but then got disabled again on vPro / AMT enabled
> systems because on some systems (Lenovo X1C7 and now also X1C8)
> this lead to suspend/resume issues.
> 
> When AMT is active then there is a handover handshake for the
> OS to get access to the ethernet controller from the ME. The
> Intel folks have checked and the Windows driver is using a timeout
> of 1 second for this handshake, yet on Lenovo systems this is
> taking 2 seconds. This likely has something to do with the
> ME firmware on these Lenovo models, can you get the firmware
> team at Lenovo to investigate this further ?
Absolutely - I'll ask them to look into this again.

We did try to make progress with this previously - but it got a bit
stuck and hence the need for these patches....but I believe things may
have changed a bit so it's worth trying again

Mark

Reply via email to