On 12/15/20 12:33 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
Fix build warnings when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not enabled and these functions are not used:../drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c:189:12: warning: ‘surface_gpe_resume’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static int surface_gpe_resume(struct device *dev) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c:184:12: warning: ‘surface_gpe_suspend’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static int surface_gpe_suspend(struct device *dev) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Fixes: 274335f1c557 ("platform/surface: Add Driver to set up lid GPEs on MS Surface device") Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> Cc: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> Cc: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] --- v2: dropped Maximilian's RVB tag since the patch changed use preferred __maybe_unused instead of ifdeffery: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/732981/ drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- linux-next-20201214.orig/drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c +++ linux-next-20201214/drivers/platform/surface/surface_gpe.c @@ -181,12 +181,12 @@ static int surface_lid_enable_wakeup(str return 0; }-static int surface_gpe_suspend(struct device *dev)+static int __maybe_unused surface_gpe_suspend(struct device *dev) { return surface_lid_enable_wakeup(dev, true); }-static int surface_gpe_resume(struct device *dev)+static int __maybe_unused surface_gpe_resume(struct device *dev) { return surface_lid_enable_wakeup(dev, false); }
Code looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Maximilian Luz <[email protected]> As already mentioned before, I'd prefer the subject line to be "platform/surface: gpe: ...", or at least "platform/surface: ..." for consistency with other commits. May just be a personal preference though, so nothing that should prevent it from being applied. Thanks, Max
