On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 17:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Masami Hiramatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > cool! Please Cc: lkml and Harvey as well so that there's less > > > overlap in unification work - Harvey spent quite some time unifying > > > and cleaning up the kprobes code during the past week. > > > > Should I rewrite it based on current git tree? > > My patch includes 3 part of patches. > > - 2 Bugfix patches (which is not merged yet.) > > - 2 booster patches (ditto) > > - 2 unification patches (most of this patches are already done by Harvey's > > patch) > > would it be easier/more robust to first did the unification patches and > then get the bugfixes and new features in? That would give us your > bugfixes and new features on both 32-bit and 64-bit at the same time. > > feel free to do whichever approach you prefer - but it would be nice to > preserve the unification and cleanup work done by Harvey. > > btw., is any of your bugfixes 2.6.24 material? >
Well, I'll admit to being a little disappointed if my work doesn't make it in, but there are bugfixes here. I think my cleanup breakout is better in the more-finegrained changes sense. If you decide to keep mine I'll rebase Masami's patches 1-4 on top of that and send it by him for resubmittal. But I'll leave it to Ingo to decide how to procede. Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
